USP Case 50/50
 We check the relevance every 3 hours

USP Case 50/50

csgo-skins.com
Case Price
$30.90
Total EV
$26.73
EV Ratio
0.865×
Skins in case
12
EV Ratio = Total EV / Case Price. A ratio of 0.865× means that statistically, each case opening returns 86.5% of the case cost. Results are random - individual outcomes will vary from statistical estimates.

Simulate openings

Roll USP Case 50/50 against its real drop rates and watch the math play out.

Skins in USP Case 50/50 (5)

csgo-skins.comUSP-S | Monster Mashup

USP-S | Monster Mashup

About this case

Where Is This Case Available?

The USP Case 50/50 case is available on csgo-skins.com. It contains 12 skins with published drop rate statistics. The Expected Value and drop rate data below reflect current statistical data for this specific case listing on csgo-skins.com.

Case Overview

The USP Case 50/50 is centered on USP-themed skins selected from multiple rarity tiers. Its item pool generally combines more common entries with a smaller set of higher-tier outcomes, creating a distribution pattern that can be examined through probability weighting. From a market perspective, the case occupies a niche focused on a single weapon category, allowing demand trends to be assessed within a narrower segment of the skin ecosystem. The structure is commonly evaluated according to item frequency, condition diversity, and the relative concentration of value across the available outcomes.

Value and Risk Factors

Expected value depends primarily on how frequently higher-demand USP skins appear relative to lower-tier alternatives. A concentrated value structure, where a limited number of items account for a significant share of theoretical return, increases variance and produces wider result dispersion. Conversely, a more balanced item pool tends to reduce variance while limiting upside concentration. Additional factors include secondary-market liquidity, long-term demand consistency for USP skins, and the proportion of outcomes that retain meaningful market relevance. Analytical assessment should focus on rarity distribution, item quality segmentation, and stability of demand across the entire pool rather than isolated outcomes.